【Watch Deadly Pickup (2016) full movie】

It's June again,Watch Deadly Pickup (2016) full movie which means it's that time of year when Facebook sticks a rainbow on several of its features in celebration of Pride. This year, to the delight of many, the company went so far as to create a rainbow Pride reaction to join in with the hahas, wows, and other well-known digital icons.

Slightly less delightful was the realization that the rainbow reaction is suspiciously absent from the profiles of some users who just so happen to live in countries that oppress members of the LGBTQ community.

SEE ALSO: Facebook's new Pride Month features celebrate the LGBTQ community with style

This, perhaps unsurprisingly, led to speculation that in limiting the Pride reaction, the company was deferring to repressive regimes.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

And for sure, it's not a good look for the social media giant. But is failing to roll out the pride reaction in countries like Singapore and Malaysia an intentional nod to those regimes' anti-LGBTQ policies, or just a really bad oversight on Facebook's part?

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

When Facebook first announced the rainbow reaction on June 5, the company was clear that it would not be available to all users. Facebook VP Alex Schultz chalked this up to the fact that the company is "testing" the feature, although he did not specify the point of the test.

"People in major markets with Pride celebrations will be able to use a temporary rainbow reaction during Pride month," Schultz explained in a blog post. "You can also like this page to access the reaction, however, because this is a new experience we’ve been testing, the rainbow reaction will not be available everywhere."

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

We reached out to Facebook to get to the bottom of what at the very least appears to be a rather questionable decision, as well as to determine just what exactly the company is testing, but received no response as of press time.

So, what's the deal here? Unfortunately, with Facebook staying mum, it's hard to know for sure. However, in the absence of an official explanation, people are left to guess as to what Facebook's motives truly are. And, frankly, it doesn't look so good.

After all, there's nothing quite like taking a bold corporate stance for equal rights while simultaneously not doing so.

---

Featured Video For You

---

This sweet interaction proves magic at Disneyland is indeed real

---

• Digital Culture
• Shopping
• Tech
• Life
• Social Good
• Science
• Entertainment
• Deals

• A Typical Wall Street Republican
• How politicians have made it easier for men like Stephen Paddock to own 42 guns
• The Google Home Mini and Max are here to take on the Amazon Echo
• 'Game of Thrones' Season 8 episodes will be 'monumental'
• Your 'wrong person' texts may be linked to Myanmar warlord
• 'Stranger Things: The Game' is just as adorably retro as the show
• Google Clips was the surprise product of the Oct 4. Pixel event
• Artist digitally vandalizes Snapchat's AR balloon dog in protest
• Best Apple deal: Save $19 on AirTag 4
• Uber's driver waiting time charges start rolling out to more countries

• Baby Yoda merch is finally here and it's almost too adorable
• SpaceX will send 4 (probably very rich) space tourists into orbit
• It's not just electric vehicles. Gas cars catch on fire, too.
• Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra's display is near
• 'Fortnite' now has a 'Never Gonna' emote for all your rickroll needs
• Man makes impressively bizarre hotel request, hotel delivers
• 10 stunning photos from India's rare queer pride march
• Jenna Fischer finally reveals what was in Jim’s teapot note to Pam on 'The Office'
• Apple might finally let you ditch its Maps and Mail apps forever
• Tesla Model 3 named top EV in 'Consumer Reports' annual list

• Skype is finally shutting down
• Woman drops her iPhone onto stranger's balcony, resorts to desperate measures to get it back
• Macy's honors 'Miracle on 34th Street' with black
• Siri thought 'Despacito' was Bulgaria's national anthem
• Philips now allows customers to 3D print replacement parts
• The most important Pixel 2 upgrade is, hopefully, availability
• Mayor of San Juan wears a 'NASTY' T
• Mayor of San Juan wears a 'NASTY' T
• The cicadas aren't invading the U.S.
• Facebook is spending $1 billion for a building that basically no one will work in

• Today's Hurdle hints and answers for May 5, 2025
• Star Wars evil droid, R2
• It's official: Your old password is totally worthless
• Tropical Storm Nate could strike the Gulf Coast as a hurricane
• The best day to book your flight, according to Google
• Costco is selling a year's worth of emergency food because the end is clearly near
• Meet Pixel Buds: Google's super smart answer to AirPods
• Online video stars need to get paid—this startup thinks cryptocurrency is the answer
• How to Settle Down with Dystopia
• Radiohead, LL Cool J Nominated for Rock & Roll Hall of Fame