Boston on Rebekka Armstrong ArchivesWednesday joined the still small, but growing, number of U.S. cities that have for the most part banned city officials' use of facial-recognition technology.
The ordinance, sponsored by Councilor Michelle Wu and Councilor Ricardo Arroyo, passed by a unanimous vote according to Councilor Wu. The new measure prohibits both the city of Boston and any official in the city of Boston from using "face surveillance" and "information derived from a face surveillance system."
There are, importantly, a few key exceptions. One such exception, allowing city employees to still use technology like Face ID to unlock their personal smartphones, is uncontroversial. Another, allowing law enforcement to "[use] evidence relating to the investigation of a specific crime that may have been generated from a face surveillance system, so long as such evidence was not generated by or at the request of Boston or any Boston official" could perhaps cause controversy down the road.
It is not impossible to imagine, as facial-recognition technology becomes cheaper and more widely accessible, citizen groups (such as those today who willingly turn their Amazon Ring videos over to police every time they see a "suspicious person") running their own facial-recognition scans and forwarding that information to police on their own accord. As currently written — as long as there was no official agreement between law enforcement and these groups, and a specific crime was being investigated — it appears police would be able to act on this problematic information.
Still, the measure broadly restricts what officials can and can't do with the powerful, but extremely flawed, technology. The city can neither run its own system, nor contract out with a third party to do so in its stead. What's more, any data gathered in violation of the ordinance "shall be considered unlawfully obtained and shall be deleted upon discovery[.]"
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Notably, this vote comes on the same day as a complaint filed by the ACLU following the wrongful arrest of Robert Williams, a Black resident of Detroit, based on faulty facial-recognition tech. Williams, and the unnamed thief police were after, are both Black men. The facial-recognition software used by Detroit police couldn't tell them apart, and incorrectly pegged Williams as the criminal.
A 2019 federal study confirmed that facial-recognition tech misidentifies Black people, the young, women, and the elderly at rates higher than that of white men.
"I never thought I'd have to explain to my daughters why daddy got arrested," Williams writes in the Washington Post. "How does one explain to two little girls that a computer got it wrong, but the police listened to it anyway?"
SEE ALSO: Congressman calls out Amazon's 'performative' facial-recognition moratorium
Boston is the second largest city, after San Francisco, to mostly ban the official use of facial-recognition tech. The measure goes into effect immediately, and follows on corporate pledges of varying legitimacy to pause the sale of facial-recognition tech to law enforcement. However, as more and more cities follow San Francisco's, Oakland's, and Berkeley's (among others) lead, the sincerity of those pledges becomes less and less significant.
Good news, it seems, is still possible.
Topics Cybersecurity Facial Recognition Privacy
Nation's largest network is down and everyone's making a Trump jokeKim Kardashian and Chrissy Teigen have officially launched a book clubInstagram albums will ruin the social network for goodNation's largest network is down and everyone's making a Trump jokeJason Momoa's two 'bodyguards' are giving Twitter a good LOL right nowStudent creates enormous 'Simpsons' portrait on his college's wintry lawnBeyoncé's pregnancy announcement spawned many, many wonderful jokesGoPro's Karma drone is back on sale after design flaw made them fall out of the skyGoogle just added a feature we always wanted for Chrome on iPhoneBeyoncé's big announcement gave an incredible start to Black History MonthThird grader has no time for your silly homework nonsenseBeyoncé's pregnancy announcement will save America, at least according to TwitterUber is pretty much throwing in the towel in TaiwanThese machines are testing human drivers’ skills with no mercyAn NBA free agent takes his job hunt to InstagramJ.K. Rowling has the perfect response to Trump trolls burning her booksIntellivision: Gone But Not ForgottenThe reunion that shocked Nicki Minaj fans on InstagramGoogle just added a feature we always wanted for Chrome on iPhone'Idol' contestant besieged by pro How to turn on YouTube's dark mode Watch Kim Jong 'Magic: The Gathering's new Japanese John Legend announces new platform for music NFTs Roland Emmerich's 'Moonfall' crashes and burns Huge lightning bolt spanning 3 U.S. states sets record Just 9 wild pitches for the inevitable 'Wordle' movie New tweak to Japanese law wipes out thousands of Airbnb listings The infamous Donald Trump and Kim Jong Spotify apparently deleted over 100 'Joe Rogan Experience' episodes YouTuber asks the internet *not* to Photoshop his pleasant honeymoon photo What we bought in January 2022: Dog clothes, people clothes, and more How to turn on Reddit's dark mode How to practice body neutrality 'Dordle' is a simultaneous double Man buys massive photo of a bridge that's right outside his window Very obedient dog waits patiently outside cafe that doesn't allow pups Apple's App Store will now let developers unlist apps Viral TikTok recipe for $1 air fryer breakfast tacos actually rules Jack Dorsey faces backlash after tweet about Chick
2.1347s , 8224.7109375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Rebekka Armstrong Archives】,Inspiration Information Network