You probably have Peter Baumgartnerno idea how recycling works.
Most Americans -- who recycle nearly 87 million tons of waste each year -- likely think that the plastic and paper thrown into those special blue bins gets sorted by some nebulous government agency and automatically becomes an environmentally-friendly product.
But that's not how it works. Recycling, first and foremost, is a business.
When recycled goods get picked up by the state's waste management corporation, they are taken to a Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) where everything is separated and packaged up to be sent to another facility where it's processed depending on the material.
For example, paper is processed at a mill where it is turned into pulp to be repurposed.
But in order for the recyclable material to get to its proper sorting center, someone has to buy it first.
And that's where we have a problem.
Recycling has worked well for the last 40 years because recycled waste was valuable and in high demand in countries around the world.
The United States has historically sold most of its recycled goods to China.
But new restrictions from the Chinese government on imported recyclables have demanded that the materials have very, very little contamination, or in the case of paper, that it is processed into pulp before reaching their shores.
Typically, contamination is a people issue. Plastic or paper with food remnants on it -- like your greasy pizza box -- cannot be recycled because those contaminants would mess up the refining process.
Contamination levels in America are at 25 percent right now, meaning 1 out 4 items in a recycling bin should actually be thrown in the trash, according to Waste Management. But China wants the contamination levels down to 0.3 percent, which is effectively code for "we will not be accepting any imported recyclable materials."
“China is sort of saying to itself we want our socioeconomic industrial programs to have recyclable programs like America does," National Waste & Recycling Association director Steve Changaris said.
"They are kicking us out, and trying to use their own wastes so they can develop their own domestic recycling capacity."
This causes problems on two fronts, he explained.
First, since the United States has to rely on other countries to buy the recyclables, the value of the commodity is staggeringly low. Over the course of 2017, the value of mixed paper dropped from $75 per ton in January to $25 per ton in December.
Second, the U.S. has more supply than these countries are demanding.
“The material keeps coming in. It’s piling up and the value is diminishing,” Changaris said. “And recycling isn’t free.”
Many Materials Recovery Facilities (MRF), especially in states that don’t put much emphasis on recycling policies, are going to be facing a hard decision as they continue to lose profit.
Unless they come up with a sustainable solution, recycling in large swaths of the United States might come to an end.
In the future, cities less committed to sustainability might have to drop their recycling programs in favor of an easier disposal program, Sims Municipal Recycling manager Tom Outerbridge said.
Waste management companies are only going to turn to landfills when that’s the cheaper option, like in Alabama, where you can put garbage in the ground for $19 a ton.
Otherwise, the more comfortable position is continue to work within the already established infrastructure and try and update it to meet the new world order.
Outerbridge says some ideas are already floating around.
Since the biggest change to the market involves mixed paper (newspapers, junk mail, and magazines) corporations in the United States are looking to swoop in and exploit the newly vacated market.
One purported way companies are making space for themselves in the market is by purchasing paper mills and retrofitting them to include processing abilities -- giving these companies the ability to turn the recycled mixed paper into pulp, and therefore bypassing China's restrictions.
But beginning that process is a huge risk.
“We don’t know for sure if this world is the new status quo," Outerbridge said.
"Chinese paper mills might be struggling without the constant influx of U.S. recyclables so much that the Chinese government eases some of the restrictions and then people go back to shipping mixed paper there.”
Current tensions between China and the U.S. certainly aren't helping. The Trump administration's recent efforts to increase U.S production of goods by increasing tariffs on Chinese goods has lead to full-scale retaliation by the Chinese government.
For example, the Chinese government placed a 25 percent tax on aluminum scraps. Formerly, the U.S. made more than $1.1 billion off of aluminum trading. The new tariff places a $300 million burden on that industry.
It's safe to say the whole infrastructure is in limbo right now, as corporations weigh their options.
A spokesperson from the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) acknowledged via email that the government organization recognizes the challenges that lie ahead when it comes to updating recycling infrastructure.
"[The] EPA is communicating with governments at the federal, state and local levels, as well as stakeholders at the private sector, to determine what (if any) additional steps should be taken at the national level regarding the domestic management of materials," the spokesperson explained.
In the mean time, MRFs are tightening up production by adding more staff to ensure that the materials collected are of the best quality -- as well as altering what is collected to more closely match the market demand according to the EPA.
Recycling hasn't reached critical failure just yet, but the industry is in desperate need of an upgrade. The alternative is a world full of trash.
Selling, Banning, and Walking by Sadie SteinDon't Miss the 1966 Tee by The Paris ReviewIf You Missed the Translation Panel… by Sadie SteinThe 1966: Spring’s Smartest Tee by Sadie SteinRemembering Rosset and Sexy Hoaxes by Sadie SteinSlang and Secrets: Happy Monday! by Sadie SteinBeautiful Bookshelves, Rule Breaking, and More! by Sadie SteinA Panorama of The House of the Seven Gables by Jason NovakDon't Miss the 1966 Tee by The Paris ReviewA Panorama of ‘Gunnar's Daughter’ by Jason NovakFrancisco Goldman, Mexico City by Matteo PericoliApp Time at The Paris Review by The Paris ReviewSinging Babushki, Bartending Poets, Cupcakes by Sadie SteinDear Lane Pryce, Some Retroactive Advice by Adam WilsonDon't Miss the 1966 Tee by The Paris ReviewListen to Flannery O’Connor read “A Good Man Is Hard to Find.”Ray Bradbury, 1920–2012 by The Paris ReviewWhat We're Loving: Sundry Practices, New Order, Flower Power by The Paris ReviewCabins, Kafka, and KFC! by Sadie SteinDear Lane Pryce, Some Retroactive Advice by Adam Wilson Win Tickets to BAM’s Artist Talk! by Sadie Stein Staff Picks: Ghost Stories, Black Books by The Paris Review The Poet's Poker by David Zax The Smartest Gifts of the Season by The Paris Review The Sporting Life by Louisa Thomas On Homesickness by Francesca Mari Part 3: The Departure by Mark Van de Walle Frank O’Hara’s “To the Harbormaster” by Olivia Cole Congratulations to Tomas Tranströmer by Lorin Stein Fake Paintings; Perfume Tester by Chris Flynn John Jeremiah Sullivan Tonight at The Half King! by The Paris Review Posters from the Paris Protests, 1968 by Atelier Populaire Wassailing by Robin Bellinger The Paris Review Auction—Now Live! by The Paris Review ‘The Phantom Tollbooth’ at Fifty by Laura Miller Taylor’s Multitudes by Liz Brown Staff Picks: Barbie's Dream House, All the Single Ladies by The Paris Review A Week in Culture: Sadie Stein, Editor by Sadie Stein Staff Picks: ‘The Doll,’ Minaudières by The Paris Review 420 Characters by Lou Beach
2.4227s , 10158.4296875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Peter Baumgartner】,Inspiration Information Network