【Anissa Kate the Widow XXX】

Suits,Anissa Kate the Widow XXX countersuits, and everything in between. When Apple and billions of dollars are involved, you know things are going to get messy.

Well, messy and interesting. Because, in what can only be read as a "don't mess with us" play from Apple CEO Tim Cook, it turns out that the Cupertino-based behemoth is financially backing the legal defense of four iPhone manufacturers in their battle with Qualcomm — a company that just so happens to own the chip technology that allows iPhones to connect to cell data networks.

SEE ALSO: Apple's internal presentation about its fight to stop leakers was, wait for it, leaked

And while at first glance this may look like a Peter Thiel-esque legal battle by proxy, Apple's motivation appears to be mostly business (and probably only partlypersonal).

Here's what's going down: As Reutersreports, on July 18, Wistron Corp, Compal Electronics Inc, Pegatron Corp, and Foxconn's parent Hon Hai Precision Industry Co all claimed antitrust violations by Qualcomm. Specifically, the companies allege Qualcomm violated the Sherman Act — an 1890 U.S. federal law "aimed at preserving free and unfettered competition as the rule of trade."

But this move didn't come out of thin air. Rather, it stems from an ongoing legal dispute between Apple and Qualcomm. Apple sued the company in January over unpaid patent license rebates, claiming Qualcomm owed it close to $1 billion, and told the aforementioned iPhone manufacturers to cease license payments to Qualcomm while everything got worked out in court.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Qualcomm then sued them all. But, with a little help from Apple, they're not taking it lying down.

A Pegatron building in Shanghai, China. Credit: VCG/GETTY

"Qualcomm has confirmed publicly that this lawsuit against our clients is intended to make a point about Apple and punish our clients for working with Apple," lawyer Theodore J. Boutrous, who is working with the four manufacturers, said in a statement picked up by Reuters. "The companies are bringing their own claims and defenses against Qualcomm."

It's not exactly clear when Apple, apparently not one to shy away from a fight, stepped in — but stepped in it has. A company spokesperson confirmed to the wire service that it's throwing down cash for the four manufacturers' legal tussle. With somewhere in the neighborhood of $250 billion in cash reserves, you better believe that Apple can afford it.

So, to recap: Apple is suing Qualcomm, Qualcomm is suing four iPhone manufacturers, and Apple is at least partially funding their defense.

Like we said, messy. One takeaway, however, is crystal clear: If you come at Apple, you'd better not miss. Apple has cash to burn, and it's clearly not afraid to light some of it on fire.

---

Featured Video For You

---

This NYU student went undercover as a worker in a Chinese iPhone factory

---

Topics Apple iPhone

• Science
• Social Good
• Entertainment
• Games
• Shopping
• Tech
• Deals
• Digital Culture

• Ryzen 5 1600X vs. 1600: Which should you buy?
• The internet hates Coca
• Italy vs. France 2024 livestream: Watch UEFA Nations League for free
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for November 16
• The 10 Most Anticipated PC Games of 2017
• NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for November 15: Tips to solve Connections #53
• The internet hates Coca
• Uruguay vs. Colombia 2024 livestream: Watch World Cup Qualifiers for free
• Parental Controls: How to Lock Down Your Kids' iOS Devices
• OpenAI reportedly working on AI agent slated for January release

• #BizChats: How to reinvent yourself and start over with Bobbi Brown
• Female senators set example for GOP as they ask Al Franken to resign
• No, you don't need an iPhone X scarf but it 100% exists
• What happens in 'The Last Jedi'? Out best prediction
• Digital activism depends on net neutrality
• Bitcoin is the perfect asset for the age of millennials
• Spotify's most streamed artists are all men. The music industry needs to do better.
• Astronaut photos show massive California wildfires from space
• Dramatic photos show firefighters battle Lilac fire north of San Diego
• Apple reveals the most popular iPhone apps of 2017

• Q&A with tendercare founder and CEO Shauna Sweeney
• Ohio State vs. Northwestern football livestreams: kickoff time, streaming deals, and more
• NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for November 17: Tips to solve Connections #55
• Wales vs. Australia 2024 livestream: Watch Autumn Internationals for free
• Ireland fines TikTok $600 million for sharing user data with China
• Who won the Paul
• ChatGPT updates for Windows and macOS: Everything you need to know
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for November 17
• Asus VivoWatch 6 AERO measures blood pressure and ECG
• Best fitness tracker deal: Get the Fitbit Google Ace LTE for $129.99 at Woot.

• The Amazon Book Sale is coming April 23 through 28
• Best kitchen deal: A renewed Vitamix Explorian blender is just $199.95 at Amazon
• Best kitchen deal: A renewed Vitamix Explorian blender is just $199.95 at Amazon
• Today's Hurdle hints and answers for November 14
• Asus VivoWatch 6 AERO measures blood pressure and ECG
• Colts vs. Jets 2024 livestream: How to watch NFL online
• Browns vs. Saints 2024 livestream: How to watch NFL online
• NYT Strands hints, answers for November 17
• FreeSync 2 Explained
• Early Best Buy Black Friday deal: Get $400 off an ASUS TUF 15.6