By now,Candy Apples Archives you've probably heard about that ridiculous, nearly decade-old privacy hoax that went viral on Instagram thanks to a bunch of clueless celebrities.
And while it's easy to laugh at, it has some pretty serious implications for the company's billion plus users.
That the hoax, which has been repeatedly debunked over the years, was able to spread like virtual wildfire across Instagram is concerning to say the least. It shows just how easily conspiracy theories and propaganda can spread, with Instagram doing little to stop it. The hoax incorrectly warns of a change in Instagram's privacy policy and encourages users to copy and paste a sloppy statement in order to block the Facebook-owned company from using their photos, messages, and other information.
While there's plenty to criticize about Facebook's misinformation-fighting, the company will at least debunk conspiracy theories and attempt to push them out of sight in its News Feed. The process has been criticized for moving too slowly at times, but there are signs it's been effective at reducing the spread of fake news.
Instagram, on the other hand, has only just begun to work with third-party fact checkers. Moreover, when a post is debunked by fact checkers, Instagram will only remove it from public-facing areas of the app, like Explore and hashtag pages. The same posts can still be freely shared in users' feeds and Stories, and Instagram will make no attempt to make them less visible.
And, as we've learned, all it takes is a handful of ignorant celebs for a baseless conspiracy theory to spread to millions in just a few hours. In this case, the conspiracy theory was relatively benign, but that might not always be the case.
If nothing else, this Instagram hoax proves that the platform is particularly susceptible to conspiracy theories, and that the company will do little to stop blatantly wrong information from going viral. Whether it's "inappropriate content" or anti-vaccination conspiracy theories, the company has repeatedly shown that it will only address misinformation in public sections of the app, not in users' feeds.
The ironic twist here is that Instagram is likely reluctant to mess with feed posts at least in part because of a whole otherconspiracy theory: shadow banning, the idea that some cabal of Instagram employees decides to reduce the visibility of some accounts for real or perceived infractions. Instagram has repeatedly denied that it does this.
But fears of further angering Instagram influencers is a poor excuse for failing to act. Facebook buries fake news and conspiracy theories in News Feed, so why won't Instagram do the same?
Topics Facebook Instagram Social Media
NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for February 15: Tips to solve Connections #145
David Beckham hilariously trolls his son Brooklyn on Instagram live
YouTube's $170 million fine isn't enough—and part of the FTC knows it
13 striking photos that capture India's 68th Republic Day preparations
Super Bowl LIX livestream: Watch Eagles vs Chiefs on Tubi
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a European launch date: Sept. 18
Rare albino alligator looks like it's made of clay
Hurricane Dorian photos illustrate havoc and destruction in the Bahamas
Moto Z Battery Beast: Mod Delivers Best in Class Smartphone Battery Life
Former James Bond Pierce Brosnan thinks it's time for a woman to play the role
Segway Xyber is a wickedly quick e
'Just Mercy' puts Michael B. Jordan in the awards race: Review
WikiHow apologizes for whitewashed image of Beyoncé, Jay Z and Barack Obama
Motorola One Zoom is the most beautiful phone I've seen in years
How to unblock XVideos for free
Motorola One Zoom is the most beautiful phone I've seen in years
Journalists across the country are using a Slack channel to tackle Trump
Facebook has a gaping loophole in its fight against fake news
Best external hard drive deal:WD 5TB Elements for $114.99
The most promising jobs of 2017, according to LinkedIn
Notes on Unreadable BooksToday Is the Final Day for Our Joint Subscription DealThe Guilt of Unsubscribing from NewslettersThe CIA Published the Soviet Edition of “Doctor Zhivago”The Font of Poetry, the Poetry of FontStaff Picks: Robot Maids, Airships, Geocities by The Paris ReviewFlower Voyeur: A Comic by Lauren R. WeinsteinThink Like a Mountain—Aldo Leopold’s Path to ConservationismThe Budding Discipline of AgnotologyNotes on Unreadable BooksWhen You Marry Someone Who Has the Same Last NameA Love Letter from Guillaume Apollinaire, in the TrenchesLooking at Vermeer’s Paintings in ManhattanWhy Michel Houellebecq Is Feuding With Le MondeMy Grandmother’s Wheelchair by Stephen HiltnerOur Ongoing Battle with JetlagLoved the Ocean, Lived in the Desert, and Other News by Dan PiepenbringHunter S. Thompson Rides with the Hells AngelsIs It Possible to Be a Conscientious Travel Writer?Notes on Unreadable Books Headscarf Games Who’s Watching Remembrance of Things Present Past in Present From the Deep Forests and Seas of Yambaru Dead the Long Year Letters and Fists The Screw Tapes Fresh Hell Impermanent Resident The Politics of Memory Difficult People The Vacillating Voters Misspent Youth In Rocinante’s Stirrups You’re Gonna Love Tomorrow Best travel deal: Save 19% on the Anker Laptop Power Bank The Sounds of Internment A Good Death Hard to Be a God
1.5364s , 10138 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Candy Apples Archives】,Inspiration Information Network