Facebook knows it has a trust problem.
In an effort to better manage how its users flag content they object to009 Archives the social media giant is planning to rate the trustworthiness of its users on an individual basis. However, the initiative comes at a time when Facebook has lost the confidence of the American people on numerous fronts ranging from its ability to protect users' private data to the veracity of the information promoted by the platform on News Feed, surveys show.
SEE ALSO: How to completely delete Facebook from your lifeThe Washington Post reports the company "has begun to assign its users a reputation score, predicting their trustworthiness on a scale from zero to 1." The score, which was reportedly developed this year, is used for internal calculations by Facebook and does not appear to be displayed in any public capacity.
Ostensibly, the scores are used to determine which users provide correct feedback about the accuracy of articles shared on the site. Which, if you're a half-trillion dollar company looking to outsource vital labor to its users, sounds like an OK idea.
However, a lot about just what the so-called trustworthiness score is remains unknown. The Postwrites that in addition to a lack of clarity on how they are calculated, we also don't know all the specific ways in which the scores are used. We don't even know if everyone on Facebook has a trustworthiness rating, or whether that potentially ignominious ranking is reserved for a lucky few.
There are some things we do know, however. In March of this year, the Pew Research Center published survey data showing that "[while] a substantial share of Americans get news from Facebook and other social media sites, very few people express much trust in information on these sites."
Specifically, continues Pew, "[only] 5% of online Americans say they have 'a lot' of trust in the information they get from social media sites."
But the fun doesn't stop there. The Business Insider Intelligence's 2018 Digital Trust survey found that 81 percent of those surveyed had "little to no confidence that Facebook will protect their data and privacy."
Essentially, people neither trust Facebook as company nor as a service. With Facebook now looking to surreptitiously quantify whether or not the people who spend their lives on its site are liars, it seems like the distrust goes both ways.
Facebook, which has credibly been accused of misleading regulators, elected officials, and the press before, disputes the Washington Post'sreporting. When reached for comment, a Facebook spokesperson claimed this was all much ado about nothing.
"The idea that we have a centralized 'reputation' score for people that use Facebook is just plain wrong and the headline in the Washington Post is misleading," wrote the spokesperson. "What we’re actually doing: We developed a process to protect against people indiscriminately flagging news as fake and attempting to game the system. The reason we do this is to make sure that our fight against misinformation is as effective as possible.”
Which, if accurate, sounds fine. If only there was some sort of way to determine whether or not Facebook is trustworthy.
Topics Facebook Social Media
Recapping Dante: Canto 18, or Beware the Bolognese by Alexander AcimanThe Morning News Roundup for March 10, 2014Love and Friendship by Sadie SteinThe History of Chock Full o’ Nuts (That Heavenly Cup)Tearjerkers by Sadie SteinIn Case You Missed It: A Look Back at Our February EssaysThe Morning News Roundup for March 3, 2014The Morning News Roundup for February 27, 2014The Morning News Roundup for February 24, 2014'Update and shut down' bug rocks some Windows usersFall Asleep Easily with This Chunk of Boring ProseThe Man with the Companion Animal by David MametTonight: Join Us for an AWP Happy Hour by Dan PiepenbringLove and Friendship by Sadie SteinHow to download apps for your FitbitA Look at Bloomingdale’s “Saturday’s Generation”Look at These Colorful Diagrams of Famous First Sentences from LiteratureDennis Wilson Was a Good Editor by Dan PiepenbringHow to change the order of photos in a carousel on Instagram'Barbenheimer' is still going strong at the box office after its second weekend Chinese mall has a 'nursery' where you can drop your husband and shop in peace How Twitter fueled the wild rise of vote rigging allegations Ground control to Jared Goff: Why won't the Rams play their franchise QB? Lenovo's latest smartphone in India has a mammoth 6.4 Grimes goes (really) old school in pro This device saves you from the new MacBook Pro's dongle hell Devotees in India take a dip in frothy, toxic river in the world's most polluted city 6 tweets that dominated this election Trump accuses tiny Singapore of stealing U.S. jobs, immediately gets trolled Apple should have seen the fake apps coming Hamster 'Seinfeld' is a remake about nothing Madonna plays surprise gig for Clinton in New York How did the FBI search through all those new Clinton emails so fast? The 8 million American votes that can't be polled NASA's huge spacecraft will soon launch to alluring ocean world The one number that shows how many people will vote today Serena Williams Snapchats s'more disappointment The Pittsburgh Steelers and the terrible, no good, very bad onside kick Office worker protectively labels Coke can that's in danger of fizzing over Farewell Francis: Dog who revolutionized YouTube cooking shows has died
2.4724s , 10137.46875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【2009 Archives】,Inspiration Information Network