Well,Thailand Archives there goes the tiniest privacy silver lining on that otherwise dark coronavirus cloud.
A new study from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found that many commercially available facial-recognition systems are still able to correctly identify people wearing face masks. As mask use becomes ever more commonplace due to the pandemic, there continues to be much law enforcement hand-wringing about possible negative effects on the pervasive surveillance technology. The NIST study suggests that police can rest easy.
The study, published Monday, evaluated the performance of 89 facial-recognition algorithms. Notably, these were all algorithms developed pre-pandemic. In other words, none of them were developed for a world where masked individuals are the norm. Even so, according to NIST, some of the algorithms performed remarkably well at identifying people with masks on.
"Using unmasked images, the most accurate algorithms fail to authenticate a person about 0.3% of the time," explains a press release accompanying the study. "Masked images raised even these top algorithms' failure rate to about 5%, while many otherwise competent algorithms failed between 20% to 50% of the time."
While that may actually sound pretty good — mask wearing increased the error rate, after all — the fact that it only increased it to about 5 percent for higher performing algorithms isn't exactly heartening.
Thankfully, there are some notable caveats to the study which may translate to a little less doom and gloom. For starters, the study authors — Mei Ngan, Patrick Grother, and Kayee Hanaoka — digitally added masks to photos in order to run the test. They admit that this creates a whole host of unknowns and new considerations.
For example, would the varying textures of real masks affect the algorithms in some unknown manner? Or, alternatively, how might the technology respond to the inconsistent fit of different masks on diverse faces?
These questions are difficult to answer without using real photos of people wearing actual masks.
What's more, the study authors "did not address the effect of eye-glasses or eye-protection." In other words, glasses or sunglasses might provide the wearer with added protection against facial recognition.
Don't get too comfortable, however, as the caveats go the other way, too. For starters, remember, this study was done on pre-pandemic algorithms. NIST already has a study in the works to look at facial-recognition technology specifically designed for the face-mask era.
"With respect to accuracy with face masks," NIST computer scientist Mei Ngan cautioned in the press release, "we expect the technology to continue to improve."
Also, there's the possibility that — in some limited cases — masks might actually make it easier to identify subjects.
"We received a suggestion that such information [like patterned masks] may serve as a soft biometric," notes the study, "in that a subject that always wears the same textured mask will be more identifiable."
SEE ALSO: Police claim 'violent extremists' exploit coronavirus to defeat facial recognition
The research was conducted "in collaboration with" both the Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection — an important fact to keep in mind as demonstrations following the killing of George Floyd continue across the country, and body-armor sporting feds respond violently to protesters in Portland, Oregon.
So the next time you take to the streets to protest police brutality and federal overreach, remember: Your coronavirus mask alone isn't enough to guarantee your anonymity.
Topics Black Lives Matter Cybersecurity Facial Recognition Privacy COVID-19
Super Bowl dishes you can make without a CrockFlamethrowers, like Elon Musk's, are mostly legal in the United StatesAMZN earnings: Jeff Bezos says 2018 Amazon to 'double down' on AlexaFAA investigates video of drone's close call with an airplaneUma Thurman shares her Weinstein story, and talks about TarantinoMozzarella stick chips are here and how have we lived without them?Why Facebook and Instagram should kill the Like buttonSelling loyalty is more valuable for Apple than selling more iPhonesTelegram back in App Store after removal for 'inappropriate content''This is Us' recap: 15 times I screamed 'nope!' as Jack diedFlying electric air taxi gets a boost from Toyota, JetBlueTwitter reacts to first 'Solo: A Star Wars Story' trailer, loves LandoJustin Timberlake really wants you to know 'Man of the Woods' isn't a country albumTarantino responds to the 'Kill Bill' crash footage that Uma Thurman posted on InstagramBudweiser, Stella Artois devote Super Bowl ads to clean water effortsCast of Netflix's 'Altered Carbon' on death, class, and dystopiaToad's mushroom head is in fact his head, not a hat, Nintendo confirms'Counter'This is Us': Why we're addicted to crying with this show about Jack's deathJustin Timberlake's 'Man of the Woods' gets savage review by Pitchfork The viral TikTok dog who stole the internet's heart is now ready for adoption Apple's big Siri update still isn't ready for primetime NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for June 9: Tips to solve Connections #259 Take advantage of Xbox Streaming and Game DVR in Windows 10 Xbox's rumored handheld console is real and it's called ROG Xbox Ally Apple's watchOS 26 comes with an AI Save up to 50% on Amazon's best books of 2025 Today's Hurdle hints and answers for June 8, 2025 Apple's iOS 26 includes improved Photos and Camera apps How to unblock Pornhub for free Apple introduces Liquid Glass to make iOS and iPadOS more expressive How Much RAM? 4GB vs. 8GB vs. 16GB Performance Portugal vs. Spain 2025 livestream: Watch UEFA Nations League final for free College professors don't know how to catch students cheating with AI Wordle today: The answer and hints for June 9, 2025 In Hindsight: Some of the Worst CPU/GPUs Purchases of 2017 Following Meta and X, YouTube backs off moderating egregious content Apple WWDC 2025: iOS 26 confirmed Beats Studio Pro deal: Get 51% off at Amazon Best headphones deal: Save 25% on the Sony XM5 headphones
2.4542s , 10133.6484375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Thailand Archives】,Inspiration Information Network